Man, it &# x27; s been a long week. Does anyone even remember it started with onetime White House counsel Don McGahn defying a Congressional subpoena at this part? Or that New York State had effectively closed a law loophole that would allow them to charge beings President Trump excused on a federal position? Does anyone recall the glee that was felt around the unexpected return to national renown of disclaimed Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland? That happened last week as well! And then there was Facebook announcing it had humbly removed almost 3.4 billion bogu accountings in the last half year, while Twitter banned the Krassenstein brethren for operating fake chronicles in an attempt to build an anti-Trump movement. Still, at least Richard Ashcroft got songwriting royalties for “Bittersweet Symphony” after all these years, right? But that &# x27; s only the beginning. Here &# x27; s what else people have been talking about online for the past seven days.
What Happened : strong> The Trump administration proposed a new law that have been able to effectively disavow trans people equal access to homeless shelters.
What Really Happened : strong> For those looking for a reason to dislike Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson that runs farther than, “He doesn &# x27; t know the difference between a term used for foreclosed qualities and a cookie” the coming week a very real one.
The timing of the report was notable, considering what had happened the day before.
Understandably, parties watched what was happening for what it really is.
Despite widespread outcry, there’s been no defense from HUD , nor an attempt to roll back the proposed changes. As of this writing, it &# x27; s being reported that trans cares are being reeled back in healthcare, as well.
The Takeaway : strong> So, what can be done in the face of this? The same as people have been doing for the past two years in response to the Trump administration &# x27; s moves: Make yourself heard.
What Happened : strong> The apparently ever-ongoing standoff between President Trump and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi got a little bit more tense this week, when Pelosi spoke the truth and hurt the president &# x27; s feelings.
What Really Happened : strong> Turns out, the President of the United States–one of the most aggressive politicians on the planet when it comes to bad-mouthing anyone who dares disagree with him–can &# x27; t take what he dishes out particularly well. On Wednesday morning, Nancy Pelosi was asked by the press what she thought about the Trump administration &# x27; s continued attempts to prevent any kind of investigation into what are clearly troubling practises. Her answer was unusually blunt.
Notably, this statement was somewhat bold considering that Pelosi has been counseling Democrat not to push for impeachment, and likewise that she said that just hours before a projected had met with President Trump to discuss infrastructure plans–something that they were not a million miles apart on, the last time the subject been put forward. Later that morning, the knowledge of her decision was evident when, at a detail when the president was supposed to be at that exceedingly infrastructure meeting with Democratic masters, the White House Press Corps got a surprise summons.
What could it be? Why was the president going to be talking to the press, instead of the Democrats? OK, so that last one had a pretty straightforward answer, contributed Trump &# x27; s affection of the former–or, at the least, talking at them, which is frequently includes calling them the opponents of the people–and detest of the latter. But the press conference, such as it was, wasn &# x27; t slight in turning what “shouldve been” subtext into outright, grassland as anything, text.
Turns out, that was right on the money.
OK, so maybe he &# x27; s merely a little sanctimonious. But , now that he’s out in front of the press, surely he is ready to do more than just criticize Democrat for conducting investigations, right?
Maybe the two will come to some kind of consensus now that they &# x27; ve both shown where they stand?
This will end well.
What Happened : strong> What happens when one of the few people who got to see Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin interact witness before Congress? Judging by what happened last week, the answer is, “The President of the United Country starts spiraling out.”
What Really Happened : strong> Something that often plunges the head about the Trump administration is the number of people who were once represented in high profile, very important, rackets but have since disappeared back into the shadows after being shot or forced to resign in disgrace. That was a thought that came to mind last week when it emerged that onetime Secretary of State Rex Tillerson had met with Congress to discuss that whole Russia thing.
Well, that seems like it might be a thing. I wonder what he said specific? Despite it being a closed-door meeting, “therere”, of course, leaks that revealed everything, and it didn &# x27; t looking good for the president.
With such an embarrassing fib being shared widely, the president &# x27; s first response was almost immediate–and almost certainly not written by the president.
How can we tell this probably wasn &# x27; t written by Trump? Because he offered his genuine response the following morning on Twitter.
Of course, when it comes to Trump &# x27; s defense, the facts don &# x27; t back up the president &# x27; s version of events.
The Takeaway : strong> There &# x27; s no way for this to make sense without the hypocrisy of the president being apparent, but that doesn &# x27; t signify the government of the united states earned &# x27; t try.
What Happened : strong> WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was charged with 17 new counts by United Mood sovereignties, and no matter what side of the Assange aisle you may sit on, these brand-new bills should be just a little concerning.
What Really Happened : strong> We &# x27; ve previously comprised the facts of the case that Julian Assange had been removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London and arrested by British officials, pending potential extradition–but to where remains an unanswered question. Swedish arbiters re-opened their investigation into sex offense charges, while the US … Well. Let’s simply chipped to Thursday afternoon last week, shall we?
But is this kind of response an overreaction?
So, an overreaction? Possibly, according to one of the US Attorneys assigned to the case.
Even if that &# x27; s true–and, to be blunt, that response pretty much falls under the “Well, they would be mentioned that, wouldn &# x27; t they? ” school of thought–it shouldn &# x27; t be overlooked that no matter the intent behind this trouble, the result could determine law instance for future trials. Which is &# x27; s important beings devoted to what &# x27; s going on, and speak out if and when necessary.
The Takeaway : strong> No, truly; this is a big deal, and could end up has become a terribly, very big deal considering the current president’s loathing for the free press.
What Happened : strong> Because the British political scene didn &# x27; t have enough uncertainty what with Brexit and all, Prime Minister Theresa May renounced on Friday, ensuring is not merely a new leadership poll, but perhaps a new general election, as well.
What Really Happened : strong> It was, in so many styles, the moment British politics had been waiting for, for months. The day after the United Kingdom voted in European elections that many had assumed it wouldn &# x27; t have to–Brexit was, recollect, supposed to have taken place back in March according to the original timetable–British Prime Minister Theresa May ultimately strolled out from the door of her mansion, 10 Downing Street, and did what parties had imagined her to do a long, long time ago.
To be fair, it wasn &# x27; t merely long ago that people had “ve been expecting” her to steps down as Prime Minister; a era before she made her bulletin, the internet was buzzing about the possibility.
What raised her down, in the end? Brexit, of course; although May had personally been against Brexit before the EU Referendum of 2016, once she became Prime Minister in July 2016, she became dogmatic in her determination that Brexit must happen no matter what–except that there turned out to be so much “no matter what” that Brexit discontinued up retarded, and apparently perpetually out of reach. This week was likely the final straw, after May offered a new Brexit plan that was soundly and immediately rejected.
But back to the responses to her actual downfall. Now &# x27; s Jeremy Corbin, the leader of the opposition party, attempting to be supportive in her defeat.
OK, that might not be so supportive. Others got the memo, though.
So, what &# x27; s next?
Even if that doesn &# x27; t happen, the short-term future for the United Kingdom doesn &# x27; t review especially enjoyable.
The Takeaway : strong> Where can we go next with this political horse race resemblance?