Why Silicon Valley billionaires are prepping for the apocalypse in New Zealand

The long speak: How situations of extreme libertarian tract prophesying the collapse of liberal republics written by Jacob Rees-Moggs father invigorated the likes of Peter Thiel to buy up property across the Pacific

If you’re interested in the end of the world, you’re interested in New Zealand. If you’re interested in how our present artistic suspicions- environment tragedy, descend of transatlantic political orderings, resurgent nuclear terror- evident themselves in apocalyptic images, you’re interested in the place dominated by this remote archipelago of self-evident peacefulnes and stability against the roiling discontent of the day.

If you’re interested in the end of the world, you would have been interested, soon after Donald Trump’s election as US president, to read a New York Times headline stating that Peter Thiel, the billionaire venture capitalist who co-founded PayPal and was an early investor in Facebook, considered New Zealand to be” the Future “. Because if you are in any serious behavior concerned about the future, you’re also concerned about Thiel, a canary-yellow in capitalism’s coal pit who also happens to have advantaged lavishly from his stake in the mining concern itself.

Thiel is in one sense a parody of outsized depravity: he was the only major Silicon Valley figure to place his heavines behind the Trump presidential campaign; he vengefully bankrupted a website because he didn’t like how they wrote about him; he is known for his public musings about the incompatibility of liberty and republic, and for uttering pastime- as though enthusiastically seeking the clunkiest possible analogy for capitalism at its most vampiric- in a regiman involving transfusions of blood from young person as a possible the ways and means of reversing the ageing process. But in another, deeper sense, “he il be” unadulterated representation: little person or persons than a shell firm for a diversified portfolio of feelings about the future, a human crest of the moral vortex at the centre of the market.

It was in 2011 that Thiel certified he’d felt” no non-eu countries that aligns more with my opinion of the future than New Zealand “. The allegation was made as part of an application for citizenship; the claim is well hurriedly conceded, though it remained a secret for a further six years. In 2016, Sam Altman, one of Silicon Valley’s most influential financiers, revealed to the New Yorkerthat he had an arrangement with Thiel whereby in the eventuality of some kind of systemic explosion situation- synthetic virus breakout, rampaging AI, reserve war between nuclear-armed districts, so forth- they both get on a private spray and operate to a belonging Thiel owns in New Zealand.( The programme from this time, you’d have to premise, was to sit out the collapse of civilisation before re-emerging to ply seed-funding for, say, the insect-based protein residue marketplace .)

In the immediate aftermath of that Altman revelation, Matt Nippert, a reporter for the New Zealand Herald, began looking into the question of how exactly Thiel have entered into possession of this apocalypse departure, a 477 -acre onetime sheep terminal in the South Island- “the worlds largest”, more sparsely populated of the country’s two major landmasses. Foreigners looking to purchase significant amounts of New Zealand land often have to pass through a rigid government vetting process. In Thiel’s case, Nippert learned , no such process became necessary, because he was already individual citizens of New Zealand, despite having spent no more than 12 days in the two countries up to that quality, and having not been seen in the place since. He didn’t even need to travel to New Zealand to have his citizenship conferred, it turned out: the batch was sealed in a private liturgy at a consulate handily located in Santa Monica.

‘ Less a person than a husk companionship for a diversified portfolio of nervousness about the future’ … Peter Thiel. Photo: VCG/ Getty

When Nippert broke the story, there was a major public gossip over the issue of whether a foreign billionaire should be able to effectively purchase citizenship. As part of his application, Thiel had agreed to invest in New Zealand tech startups, and had implied that he would use his new status as a naturalised Kiwi to promote the country’s business fascinates abroad. But the focus internationally was on why Thiel might have wanted to own a hunk of New Zealand approximately the size of lower Manhattan in the first place. And the overwhelming idea was that he was looking for a rampart to which he could retreat in the event of outright civilisational collapse.

Because this is the role that New Zealand now plays in our unfurling ethnic excitement dreaming: an island sanctuary amid a rising tide of apocalyptic uneasines. According to the country’s Department of Internal Thing, in the two days following the 2016 election the number of Americans who visited its internet site to be informed about the process of gaining New Zealand citizenship increased by a factor of 14 compared to the same days in the previous month. In special, New Zealand has come to be seen as a bolthole of preference for Silicon Valley’s tech elite.

In the immediate aftermath of Trump’s election, the theme of American plutocrats preparing for the holocaust was hopeless to escape. The week after the initiation, the New Yorker operated another part about the super-rich who were realise preparations for a grand civilisational crackup; be talking about New Zealand as a” favored refuge in cases where there a cataclysm “, billionaire LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman, a former peer of Thiel’s at PayPal, was of the view that” saying you’re’ buying a house in New Zealand’ is various kinds of a winking, wink, say no more “.

Everyone is always saying these days that it’s easier to picture the end of the world than the end of capitalism. Everyone is always saying it, in my view, because it’s obviously true-life. The perception, obsessive or otherwise, that billionaires are preparing for a coming civilisational crumble seems a literal show of this axiom. Those who are saved, in the end, will be those who can open the premium of saving. And New Zealand, the outermost plaza from anywhere, is in this narrative a kind of new Ararat: a arrange of awning from the coming flood.

Early last summer, just as my sakes in the topics of civilisational crumble and Peter Thiel were beginning to intersect into a single obsession, I received out of the blue an email from a New Zealand art critic identified Anthony Byrt. If I wanted to understand the extreme creed that underpinned Thiel’s attraction to New Zealand, he claimed, I needed to understand an obscure libertarian manifesto called The Sovereign Individual: How to Endure and Thrive During the Collapse of the Welfare State. It were released in 1997, and in recent years something of a minor sect has grown up around it in the tech nature, primarily as a result of Thiel’s quoting it as the book he is most influenced by.( Other foremost boosters include Netscape founder and venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, and Balaji Srinivasan, the inventor good known for advocating Silicon Valley’s terminated secession from the US to model its own corporate city-state .)

The Sovereign Individual’s co-authors are James Dale Davidson, a private investor who specialises in cautioning the rich on how to profit from fiscal trouble, and the late William Rees-Mogg, long-serving journalist of the Times.( One other noticeable position of Lord Rees-Mogg’s ran legacy is his “sons “, the Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg– a promptly sketched mockery of an Old Etonian, who is as beloved of Britain’s ultra-reactionary pro-Brexit right as he is disliked by the left .)


I was intrigued by Byrt’s description of the book as a kind of master key of the linkages between New Zealand and the techno-libertarians of Silicon Valley. Reluctant to improve Davidson or the Rees-Mogg estate any further, I bought a put-upon volume online, the musty sheets of which were here and there slandered with the desiccated snot of whatever nose-picking libertarian predated me.

It presents a bleak vista of a post-democratic future. Amid a brush of analogies to the prehistoric downfall of feudal power structures, the book likewise controlled, a decade before the ability of bitcoin, to move some impressively accurate projections about the advent of online economies and cryptocurrencies.

The book’s 400 -odd sheets of near-hysterical orotundity can roughly be broken down into the following sequence of overtures 😛 TAGEND

1) The democratic nation-state basically operates like a criminal cartel, making honest the general public to capitulate large portions of their affluence is payable for stuff like streets and hospices and schools.

2) The rise of the internet, and the onset of cryptocurrencies, will make it impossible for governments to intervene in private business and to tax incomes, thereby liberating souls from the political protection fus of democracy.

3) The territory will hence become obsolete as a political entity.

4) Out of this wreckage will emerge a brand-new world dispensation, in which a” cognitive upper-clas” will rise to power and influence, as a class of sovereign mortals” requiring hugely greater riches” who will no longer be subject to the influence of nation-states and will redesign the administration is clothing their ends.

The Sovereign Individual is, in the most misprint of abilities, an apocalyptic verse. Davidson and Rees-Mogg present an explicitly millenarian seeing of the near future: the collapse of old lineups, the rising of a new world. Liberal democracies will die out, and be replaced by loose confederations of corporate city-states. Western civilisation in its present form, they insist, will end with the millennium.” The new Sovereign Individual ,” they write,” will operate like the gods of belief in the same physical context as the regular, subject citizen, but in a separate realm politically .” It’s impossible to overstate the darkness and member of the book’s predictions of capitalism’s future; to read it is to be continually reminded that the dystopia of your darkest insomniac reckons is almost always someone else’s dream of a brand-new utopian dawn.

Davidson and Rees-Mogg linked New Zealand as an ideal location for this new class of sovereign men, as a” domicile of selection for wealth creation in the Information Age “. Byrt, who attracted my attention to these legislations, had even turned up evidence of a property handled in the mid-1 990 s in which a monstrous sheep terminal at the southern tip of the North Island was purchased by a conglomerate whose major shareholders included Davidson and Rees-Mogg. Also in on the deal was one Roger Douglas, the onetime Labour finance minister who had presided over a revolutionary restructuring of New Zealand economy along neoliberal wrinkles in the 1980 s.( This period of so-called ” Rogernomics“, Byrt was just telling me- the selling off of state assets, trouncing of aid, deregulation of financial markets- composed the political conditions that had obliged the country such an handsome prospect for prosperous Americans .)

Thiel’s interest in New Zealand was certainly fuelled by his JRR Tolkien obsession: this was a man who had specified at the least five of his companionships in reference to The Lord of the Rings, and fantasised as a boy about representing chess against a robot who are able to discuss the books. It is a topic, too, of the country’s abundance of clean-living irrigate and the amenity of overnight flights from California. But it was also inseparable from a particular strand of apocalyptic techno-capitalism. To read The Sovereign Individual was to see this ideology laid bare: these beings, the self-appointed” cognitive society”, were content to learn the unravelling of the world as long as we are able to carry on organizing affluence in the end times.

New Zealand as Middle-earth in The Lord of the Peals: Companionship of the Ring. Photograph: Everett/ Rex

I was been hit by how strange and disquieting it must have been for a New Zealander to see their own country refracted through this strange cataclysmic lens. There was certainly an ambient awareness that the tech life privileged had developed an quirky interest in the country as an ideal end-times bolthole; it would have been difficult, at any rate, to ignore the recent cascade of articles about Thiel acquiring citizenship, and the apocalyptic inferences of same. But there seemed to have been basically zero discussion of the frankly panicking ideological magnitude of it all.

It was just this ideological feature, as it happened, that was the focus of a project Byrt himself had recently got involved in, a new showcase by the master Simon Denny. Denny, a significant figure in the international art incident, was originally from Auckland, but has lived for some years in Berlin. Byrt described him as both” kind of a genius” and” the poster-boy for post-internet skill, whatever that is “; he characterised his own role in the project with Denny as an merger of researcher, correspondent and” investigative philosopher, in accordance with the footpath of new ideas and dogmata “.

The exhibition was announced The Founder’s Paradox, a epithet that came from the designation of one of the chapters in Thiel’s 2014 book, Zero to One: Greenbacks on Startups, or How to Improve the Future. Together with the long and intricately detailed catalogue essay Byrt was writing to accompany it, the prove was a judging with the future that Silicon Valley techno-libertarians like Thiel wanted to build, and with New Zealand’s place in that future.

These were interviews I very would be grateful to reckon with. Which is to say that I myself was engaged- helplessly, morbidly- in the end of the world, and that I was therefore interested in New Zealand. And so I decided to go there, to ascertain for myself the ground that Thiel had apparently set aside for the collapse of civilisation: a plaza that would become for me a kind of labyrinth, and whose proprietor I was already beginning to mythologise as the villain at its centre.

Within about an hour of arrived here Auckland, I was as close to catatonic from tirednes as determined no change, and staring into the maw of a volcano. I was digesting next to Byrt, who’d picked me up from the airport and, in a gesticulate I would come to understand as quintessentially Kiwi, dragged me directly up the side of a volcano. This particular volcano, Mount Eden, was a somewhat domesticated specimen, around which is now being spread one of the most affluent suburbs of Auckland- the only metropolitan in the world, I learned, built on a technically still-active volcanic field.

I was a little out of wheeze from the climb and, having simply emerged in the southern hemisphere from a Dublin November, sweating liberally in the relative heat of the early summertime morning. I was also suffering near-psychotropic levels of jetlag. I must have appeared a little bit off, because Byrt- a whiskered, hoodied and baseball-capped male in his late 30 s- offered a joyful regret for playing the volcano placard earlier today in the proceedings.

” I possibly should have easy you into it, mate” he chuckled.” But I thought it’d be good to get a examine of the city before breakfast .”

The view of Auckland and its circumventing islands was indeed ravishing- though in retrospect, it was no more ravishing than any of the countless other judgments I would wind up coming ravished by in the course of the coming 10 daytimes. That, famously, is the whole station of New Zealand: if you don’t like get ravished by examines, you have no business in the place; to travel there is to give implicit consent to being hustled left, right and centre into positions of aesthetic rapture.

A look of Auckland from Mount Eden. Photo: Alamy

” Plus I’ve been in the two countries mere minutes ,” I said,” and I’ve already got a excellent visual metaphor for the fragility of civilizations in the bag .”

I was pertaining now to the pleasingly surreal spectacle of a volcanic crater overlaid with a surface of neatly manicured grass.( I jotted this statement down in my diary, seeming as I did so a smug mixture of virtue about get some literary non-fiction squared away before even ceasing my bags off at the inn.” Volcano with lawn over it ,” I scrawled.” Visual show of thematic theme: Civ as thin layer strained over chaos .”)

I noted on the strangeness of all these Silicon Valley geniuses presumably apocalypse-proofing themselves by buying up land down here right on the Pacific Ring of Fire, the horseshoe curve of geological fault lines that extends upward from the countries of the western thigh of the Americas, back up along the eastern coasts of Russia and Japan and on into the South Pacific.

“Yeah,” said Byrt,” but some of them are buying farms and sheep stations somewhat far inland. Tsunamis aren’t going to be a big issue there. And what they’re after is opening, and clean spray. Two occasions we’ve got a lot of down now .”

The following date, I went to the gallery in downtown Auckland to take a look at The Founder’s Paradox. Denny, a neat and droll humankind in his mid-3 0s, talked me through the conceptual frame. It was structured around plays- in theory playable, but in practice encountered as statues- representing two all kinds of political vision for New Zealand’s future. The bright and airy ground floor opening was filled with tactile, bodily game-sculptures, riffs on Jenga and Operation and Twister. These undertakings, incorporating coordinated and spontaneous ideas of frolic, were informed by a recent journal announced The New Zealand Project by a young leftwing thinker reputation Max Harris, which analyse a humane, collectivist politics influenced by Maori beliefs about society.

Down in the low-ceilinged, dungeon-like vault was a situated of figures based around an entirely different to better understand continue, more rule-bound and cerebral. These were based on the kind of strategy-based role-playing games specially beloved of Silicon Valley tech kinds, and representing a Thielian imagination of the country’s future. The mental the consequences of this spatial feature of the demonstrate was immediate: upstairs, you are able wheeze, you could see concepts clearly, whereas to walk downstairs was to feel subjugated by low-grade ceilings, by a lack of natural light-colored, by the darkness of the geek-apocalypticism included as part of Denny’s develop sculptures.

This was a world Denny himself knew intimately. And what was strangest and most unnerving about his art was the sense that he was allowing us to see this world-wide not from the outside in, but from the inside out. Over beers in Byrt’s kitchen the previous nighttime, Denny had told me about a dinner party he had been to in San Francisco earlier that year, at the home of a techie acquaintance, where “hes been” set next to Curtis Yarvin, founder of the Thiel-funded computing platform Urbit. As any person who is takes an unhealthy interest in the weirder niches of the online far-right is mindful, Yarvin is more widely known as the blogger Mencius Moldbug, the intellectual progenitor of Neoreaction, an antidemocratic movement that advocates for a kind of white-nationalist oligarchic neofeudalism- power by and for a self-proclaimed cognitive elite- and which has encountered a small but influential constituency in Silicon Valley. It was clear that Denny was deeply unsettled by Yarvin’s brand of nerd autocracy, but similarly clear that smashing food with him was in itself no huge discomfort.

‘ A Thielian perception of the country’s future’ … The Founder’s Paradox, a board game by craftsman Simon Denny. Picture: Simon Denny/ Michael Lett Gallery

Beneath all the intricacy and detail of its world-building, The Founder’s Paradox was clearly invigorated by an shaky enthusiasm with the utopian future guessed by the techno-libertarians of Silicon Valley, and with New Zealand’s role in that future. The exhibition’s centrepiece was a tabletop policy game called Founders, which attracted heavily on the aesthetic- as well as the explicitly colonialist usage and objectives- of Settlers of Catan, a cult multiplayer approach board game. The aim of Founders, clarified by the accompanying text and by the piece’s lurid sketches, was not simply to sidestep the holocaust, but to prosper from it. First you acquired arrive in New Zealand, with its rich financial resources and clean air, away from the chaos and ecological anguish gripping the countries of the world. Next you moved on to seasteading, the libertarian ideal of erecting manmade islands in international waters; on these swimming utopian micro-states, rich tech trailblazers would be free to go about their business without intervention from democratic authorities.( Thiel was an early investor in, and proponent of, the seasteading push, though the best interests has diminished in recent years .) Then you quarried the moon for its ore and other resources, before moving on to colonise Mars. This last-place degree of the game manifested the current well-liked futurist fiction, most famously advanced by Thiel’s onetime PayPal colleague Elon Musk, with his dream of fleeing a expiring planet Soil for personally owned colonies on Mars.

The influence of the Sovereign Individual, and of Byrt’s obsession with it, was all over the appearance. It was a detailed mapping of a possible future, in all its way sophisticated atrocity. It was a utopian nightmare that appeared, in all its garish detail and specificity, as the nightmare seeing of a nature to come.

Thiel himself had voiced publicly of New Zealand as a “utopia”, over the period in 2011 when he was exercising for citizenship, investing in numerous local startups under a venture capital store announced Valar Crusades.( I scarcely need to tell you that Valar is another Tolkien cite .) This was a man with a particular understanding of what a utopia might look like, who did not conclude, after all, in the conformity of freedom and republic. In a Vanity Fair essay about his character as adviser to Trump’s campaign, a pal was paraphrased as went on to say that” Thiel has said to me directly and repeatedly that he wanted to have home countries”, adding that he had even started in so far as to price up the prospect at somewhere around $100 bn.

The Kiwis I spoke with were uncomfortably aware of what Thiel’s interest in their country represented, to seeing how it appeared to digit more generally in the frontier myths of American libertarians. Max Harris- the author of The New Zealand Project, the book that taught the game-sculptures on the upper rank of The Founder’s Paradox- point out here that that, for much of its history, the two countries tended to be viewed as a kind of government Petri dish( it was, for example, the first nation to recognise women’s right to referendum ), and that this” perhaps becomes Silicon Valley kinds think it’s a kind of blank canvas to sprinkle notions on “.

Donald Trump and Peter Thiel at Trump Tower in December 2016. Photograph: Bloomberg/ Getty

When we met in her agency at the Auckland University of Technology, the legal scholar Khylee Quince was of the view that any invocation of New Zealand as a utopia was a” monstrous red flag “, particularly to Maori like herself.” That is the language of emptiness and isolation that was always exerted about New Zealand during colonial times ,” she said. And it was always, she emphasized, a narrative that erased the presence of those who were already here: her own Maori predecessors. The first major colonial meeting for Maori in the 19 th century was not with representation from the British crown, she point out here that, but with laissez-faire economy. The New Zealand Company was a private conglomerate founded by a convicted English child kidnapper referred Edward Gibbon Wakefield, with the aim of captivating affluent investors with an abundant supply of inexpensive labour- migrant workers who could not themselves render to buy region in the new colony, but who would travelling there in the expectations of eventually saving enough wages to buy in. The firm embarked on a series of excursions in the 1820 s and 30 s; it was only when the firm started describing up plans to formally colonise New Zealand, and to be established a government of its own devising, that the British colonial role advised the treetop to take steps to establish a formal colony. In the utopian imaginations of techno-libertarians like Thiel, Quince encountered an resemble of that period of her country’s history. “Business,” she said,” came now first .”

Given her Maori heritage, Quince was particularly attuned to the colonial resonances of the most recent expression around New Zealand as both an cataclysmic hideaway and a utopian gap for American wealth and ingenuity.

” I find it fantastically offensive ,” she said.” Thiel get citizenship after investing 12 daylights in its own country, and I don’t know if he’s even aware that Maori subsist. We as indigenous people have a very strong feel of intergenerational identity and collectivity. Whereas these beings, who are sort of the contemporary iteration of the coloniser, are coming from an creed of unrestrained individualism, flagrant capitalism .”

Quince’s view was by no means the norm. New Zealanders tend to be more flattered than troubled by the interest of Silicon Valley tech guru in their country. It’s received by and large as a be pointed out that the oppression of length- situations of extreme antipodean remoteness that has mold the country’s impression of itself since colonial times- has finally been toppled by the liberating armies of technology and economic globalisation.

” It’s very plea ,” the political scientist Peter Skilling told me,” these industrialists saying nice concepts about us. We’re like a feline having its paunch chafe. If Silicon Valley types are greeted now, it’s not because we’re particularly susceptible to libertarian ideas; it’s because we are self-complacent and naive .”

Among the leftwing Kiwis I spoke with, there had been a kindling of prudent hope, triggered by the recent catch election of a new Labour-led bloc government, under the leadership of the 37 -year-old Jacinda Ardern, whose young people and self-evident idealism proposed a removed from neoliberal creed. During such elections, foreign ownership of estate had been a major talking point, although it was focused less on the affluent apocalypse-preppers of Silicon Valley than the perception that overseas belonging adventurers were representing an increase of the cost of homes in Auckland. The incoming government had committed to tightening regulations around estate acquisitions by foreign investors. This was largely the doing of Winston Peters, a nationalist of Maori descent whose New Zealand First party regarded the balance of strength, and was strongly in favour of stiffening regulations of foreign possession. When I speak that Ardern had mentioned Peters as her deputy prime minister, I was amazed to recognise the specify- from, of all places, The Sovereign Individual, where Davidson and Rees-Mogg had singled him out for weirdly personal mistreat as an arch-enemy of the rising cognitive society, referring to him as a” reactionary loser” and “demagogue” who would” gladly stymie future prospects for long-term fortune time to prevent types from testifying their independence of politics “.

Jacinda Ardern, prime minister of New Zealand. Image: Phil Walter/ Getty Images

During my time in New Zealand, Ardern was everywhere: in the working paper, on tv, in every other conference. On our path to Queenstown in the South Island, to envision for ourselves the website of Thiel’s cataclysmic bolthole, Byrt and I were in the security thread at Auckland airport when the status of women of about our senility, smartly garmented and accompanied by a collection of serious-looking males, glanced in our tack as she used conveyed swiftly along the express thoroughfare. She was talking on her telephone, but looked towards us and motioned at Byrt, smiling broadly in fortunate recognition.

” Who was that ?” I asked.

“Jacinda,” he said.

” You know her ?”

” We know a lot of the same parties. We gratified for a booze a couple of times back when she was Labour’s arts spokesman .”


” Well yeah ,” he giggled,” there’s only so many of us .”

” The endgame for Thiel is virtually The Sovereign Individual ,” said Byrt. He was driving the rental car, allowing me to fully focus my resources to the ongoing gardening of aesthetic rapture( elevations, lakes, so forth ).” And the bottom line for me ,” he said,” is that I don’t want my son to grow up in that future .”

We were on our road to accompany for ourselves the part of New Zealand, along the shores of Lake Wanaka in the South Island, that Thiel had bought for purposes of post-collapse existence. We talked about the errand as though it were a gesture of assert, but it felt like a kind of perverted pilgrimage. The call “psychogeography” was cautiously cited, and with simply the lightest of sardonic inflections.

” The stuff about Thiel is he’s the villain at the heart of the labyrinth ,” said Byrt.

” He’s the grey whale ,” I intimated, coming into the literary atmosphere of the enterprise.

Byrt’s obsession with Thiel dominated a kind of Melvillean register, desired toward a mythic scale. It coloured his knowledge of actuality. He admitted, for example, to a strange aesthetic pathology whereby he encountered, in the alpine dignity of the South Island , not the sublime charm of his own “countries “, but preferably what he envisaged Thiel accompanying in the place: Middle-earth. Thiel’s Tolkien fixation was itself a fixation for Byrt: along with the extreme libertarianism of The Sovereign Individual, he was convinced that it lay beneath Thiel’s continued interest in New Zealand.

Matt Nippert, the New Zealand Herald columnist who had ended the citizenship narration earlier that year, told me he was certain that Thiel had bought the quality for apocalypse-contingency roles. In his citizenship lotion, he had promised his commitment to devote” a significant amount of time and resources to the people and industries of New Zealand “. But none of this had amounted to lots, Nippert said, and he was convinced it would just like to ever been a feint to get him in the door as a citizen.

In a cafe in Queenstown, about an hour’s drive from Thiel’s estate, Byrt and I met a subject to whom a rich relationship of Byrt’s had introduced us. A well known and well connected professional in Queenstown, he agreed to speak anonymously for fear of reaching himself unpopular among regional business leaders and friends in the tourism transaction. He had been concerned for a while now about the effects on the area of rich foreigners buying up big tracts of shore. (” Once “youre starting” pissing in the hand container, where are you gonna wash your front ?”

Read more: https :// www.theguardian.com/ story/ 2018/ feb/ 15/ why-silicon-valley-billionaires-are-prepping-for-the-apocalypse-in-new-zealand

Posted in BaseballTagged , , , , ,